Speaking Feedback Date : 2016/06/05 Speaker: Matthew Sung Evaluator: Dong Gun Lee Title : University Policy for retaking courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have? His voice is very clear and easy to hear. Also, the speed of his speech made it easier to understand.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? The subject is directly related to HUFS students. I was able to know more about HUFS students’ opinions toward retaking courses.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes. He conducted a survey before his speech and also made a visual aid to better inform the audience.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? As I’ve mentioned earlier, he spoke clearly and audibly. However, it would be better if he spoke a little more formally on stage.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? He opened his speech with a question. Also, the results of the survey and the implication. Lastly, he concluded his speech with what he thinks about the result.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. He made eye contacts with the audience. However, it would have been better if he made more eye contacts, as he went up and down looking at his speech.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? It would have been better if he better emphasized the important parts.
8. What did you like about the presentation? It was an impressing speech. It was well organized and prepared.
Speaking Feedback Date : June 18th Speaker: Matthew Sung Evaluator: Euiyeon Kim Title : University Policy for Taking Courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have? : His presentation was very gripping. The survey questions were well-thought out, and his delivery was uniquely enunciated, easy to follow. His ability to present in a natural, confident way definitely made him stand out.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? : The survey questions were quite thorough, and the results were analyzed thoughtfully with the speaker's interesting insights. The graphs on the Powerpoint helped the audience follow the presentation easily.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? : The presentation seemed to be prepared quite well. The survey questions were elaborately formed, and the graphs showed considerable effort.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? : Yes, in fact it was one of the strongest points of the presentation. His pronunciation was very clear and his intonation helped the audience follow the speech easily.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? : Yes. In the opening, he talked about
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. : 7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
8. What did you like about the presentation? : Overall, it was very well paced and clearly presented. The speaker did a great job on keeping the audience focused with a remarkable stage presence. Also, I like that his topic is Speaking Feedback Date : June 18th Speaker: Matthew Sung Evaluator: Euiyeon Kim Title : University Policy for Taking Courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have? : His presentation was very gripping. The survey questions were well-thought out, and his delivery was uniquely enunciated, easy to follow. His ability to present in a natural, confident way definitely made him stand out.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? : The survey questions were quite thorough, and the results were analyzed thoughtfully with the speaker's interesting insights. The graphs on the Powerpoint helped the audience follow the presentation easily.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? : The presentation seemed to be prepared quite well. The survey questions were elaborately formed, and the graphs showed considerable effort. Also, the fact that he acknowledged the point where he made a mistake in conducting the survey shows that he put a lot of thought and reflection into the results.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? : Yes, in fact it was one of the strongest points of the presentation. His pronunciation was very clear and his intonation helped the audience follow the speech easily.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? : Yes. He described the survey in the opening, showed the results in the body, and explained what the results might imply in the conclusion.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. : He did look down at his notes a few times during the speech, but it did not disturb him from making eye contact with every member of the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? : It would have been better if he had shown more body language, such as facial expressions and gestures to emphasize certain points of the presentation.
8. What did you like about the presentation? : Overall, it was very well paced and clearly presented. The speaker did a great job on keeping the audience focused with a remarkable stage presence. Also, I like that he chose a topic that concerns students in real life. Impressive speech!
Speaking Feedback Date : June 18th Speaker: Matthew Sung Evaluator: Euiyeon Kim Title : University Policy for Taking Courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have? : His presentation was very gripping. The survey questions were well-thought out, and his delivery was uniquely enunciated, easy to follow. His ability to present in a natural, confident way definitely made him stand out.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? : The survey questions were quite thorough, and the results were analyzed thoughtfully with the speaker's interesting insights. The graphs on the Powerpoint helped the audience follow the presentation easily.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? : The presentation seemed to be prepared quite well. The survey questions were elaborately formed, and the graphs showed considerable effort. Also, the fact that he acknowledged the point where he made a mistake in conducting the survey shows that he put a lot of thought and reflection into the results.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? : Yes, in fact it was one of the strongest points of the presentation. His pronunciation was very clear and his intonation helped the audience follow the speech easily.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? : Yes. He described the survey in the opening, showed the results in the body, and explained what the results might imply in the conclusion.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. : He did look down at his notes a few times during the speech, but it did not disturb him from making eye contact with every member of the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? : It would have been better if he had shown more body language, such as facial expressions and gestures to emphasize certain points of the presentation.
8. What did you like about the presentation? : Overall, it was very well paced and clearly presented. The speaker did a great job on keeping the audience focused with a remarkable stage presence. Also, I like that he chose a topic that concerns students in real life. Impressive speech!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : 2016/06/05
Speaker: Matthew Sung
Evaluator: Dong Gun Lee
Title : University Policy for retaking courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have?
His voice is very clear and easy to hear. Also, the speed of his speech made it easier to understand.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
The subject is directly related to HUFS students. I was able to know more about HUFS students’ opinions toward retaking courses.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes. He conducted a survey before his speech and also made a visual aid to better inform the audience.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
As I’ve mentioned earlier, he spoke clearly and audibly. However, it would be better if he spoke a little more formally on stage.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
He opened his speech with a question. Also, the results of the survey and the implication. Lastly, he concluded his speech with what he thinks about the result.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
He made eye contacts with the audience. However, it would have been better if he made more eye contacts, as he went up and down looking at his speech.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
It would have been better if he better emphasized the important parts.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
It was an impressing speech. It was well organized and prepared.
Speaking Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : June 18th
Speaker: Matthew Sung
Evaluator: Euiyeon Kim
Title : University Policy for Taking Courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have?
: His presentation was very gripping. The survey questions were well-thought out, and his delivery was uniquely enunciated, easy to follow.
His ability to present in a natural, confident way definitely made him stand out.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
: The survey questions were quite thorough, and the results were analyzed thoughtfully with the speaker's interesting insights. The graphs on the Powerpoint helped the audience follow the presentation easily.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
: The presentation seemed to be prepared quite well. The survey questions were elaborately formed, and the graphs showed considerable effort.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
: Yes, in fact it was one of the strongest points of the presentation. His pronunciation was very clear and his intonation helped the audience follow the speech easily.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
: Yes. In the opening, he talked about
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
:
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
8. What did you like about the presentation?
: Overall, it was very well paced and clearly presented. The speaker did a great job on keeping the audience focused with a remarkable stage presence. Also, I like that his topic is
Speaking Feedback
Date : June 18th
Speaker: Matthew Sung
Evaluator: Euiyeon Kim
Title : University Policy for Taking Courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have?
: His presentation was very gripping. The survey questions were well-thought out, and his delivery was uniquely enunciated, easy to follow.
His ability to present in a natural, confident way definitely made him stand out.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
: The survey questions were quite thorough, and the results were analyzed thoughtfully with the speaker's interesting insights. The graphs on the Powerpoint helped the audience follow the presentation easily.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
: The presentation seemed to be prepared quite well. The survey questions were elaborately formed, and the graphs showed considerable effort. Also, the fact that he acknowledged the point where he made a mistake in conducting the survey shows that he put a lot of thought and reflection into the results.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
: Yes, in fact it was one of the strongest points of the presentation. His pronunciation was very clear and his intonation helped the audience follow the speech easily.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
: Yes. He described the survey in the opening, showed the results in the body, and explained what the results might imply in the conclusion.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
: He did look down at his notes a few times during the speech, but it did not disturb him from making eye contact with every member of the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
: It would have been better if he had shown more body language, such as facial expressions and gestures to emphasize certain points of the presentation.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
: Overall, it was very well paced and clearly presented. The speaker did a great job on keeping the audience focused with a remarkable stage presence. Also, I like that he chose a topic that concerns students in real life.
Impressive speech!
Speaking Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : June 18th
Speaker: Matthew Sung
Evaluator: Euiyeon Kim
Title : University Policy for Taking Courses
1. What strong points does the speaker have?
: His presentation was very gripping. The survey questions were well-thought out, and his delivery was uniquely enunciated, easy to follow.
His ability to present in a natural, confident way definitely made him stand out.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
: The survey questions were quite thorough, and the results were analyzed thoughtfully with the speaker's interesting insights. The graphs on the Powerpoint helped the audience follow the presentation easily.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
: The presentation seemed to be prepared quite well. The survey questions were elaborately formed, and the graphs showed considerable effort. Also, the fact that he acknowledged the point where he made a mistake in conducting the survey shows that he put a lot of thought and reflection into the results.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
: Yes, in fact it was one of the strongest points of the presentation. His pronunciation was very clear and his intonation helped the audience follow the speech easily.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
: Yes. He described the survey in the opening, showed the results in the body, and explained what the results might imply in the conclusion.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
: He did look down at his notes a few times during the speech, but it did not disturb him from making eye contact with every member of the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
: It would have been better if he had shown more body language, such as facial expressions and gestures to emphasize certain points of the presentation.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
: Overall, it was very well paced and clearly presented. The speaker did a great job on keeping the audience focused with a remarkable stage presence. Also, I like that he chose a topic that concerns students in real life.
Impressive speech!
Ignore the first comment! Something went wrong with that one but I don't know how to erase it!! -Euiyeon
ReplyDelete