Monday, June 6, 2016

Euiyeon Kim/ Presentation 2/ Friday 12

Suh Dong Hyeon/informative speech/Friday 12

Kyungmin Park / Assignment 2 / Friday 12



Thank you! :)



Speaking Feedback
Date : June 6th, 2016
Speaker: Kyungmin Park
Evaluator: Self-evaluation
Title : Three stages of falling in love

1. What strong points does the speaker have?
- The speaker speaks in a clear tone and with clear pronunciation.
- The speaker constantly makes eye contact to the audience.
- The speaker makes few grammatical errors. She also used advanced collocations and vocabularies.
- The speaker looked passionate and confident, when she was talking about the topic.
- The speaker introduced a fresh perspective about the well-known concept "Love"

2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
- The speaker related herself with her experience to help audience's understanding.
- The speaker was able to explain about field-specific concepts such as hormones with her own words.

3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
- The visual aid was prepared and the duration of the speech was just right about 6 minutes.
- The speech was well divded into introduction, body and conclusion.

4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
- The speaker talked clearly and audibly. Her pronunciation was easy to understand and there was no mumbling during the speech.
- The speed of the speech was good.
- However, there were some filler words that could distract the audience from concentrating. Moreover, the tone of the speech was somewhat monotonous.

5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
- The speech had clear introduction, body and conclsion.
- The introduction was strong enough to gain listeners' attention.
- The speaker sumarized the body part in the conclusion. Moreover, she finished her speech with a quote about the topic to motivate the listeners to ponder the subject.

6. Please comment on the speaker's use of notes/eye contact.
- The speaker constantly looked at her note pads and her eye contact was not evenly distributed.
- The speaker looked nervous whenever she tried to look at her notes.
- However, she constantly made eye contact with the audience and stayed calm throughout the speech.

7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
- It would have been much better if the speaker depended less on the note pad.
- Moreover, the speaker should have used emphasis and pause to sound more energetic. The speaker also should have used more gestures.

8. What did you like about the presentation?
- The topic of the speech was fresh and creative. The speaker put a lot of efforts to look at love in different perspective.
- The speaker's tone was clear to understand and easy to follow.
- The speech itself was more easy to understand, since the speaker used her experience to explain about the topic. The speaker sounded very authentic by relating herself to the topic.
- Opening and closing remarks were strong enough to gain attention.
- Throughout the speeh was well organized and well prepared.

Saturday, June 4, 2016

Yu Seo Young/ Assignment 1/ Presenting in English Friday 12

Sumin Cho / Assignment 2 / Presenting in English Fri 1-2

Sumin Cho Presenting in English Fri1~2 Fin

https://youtu.be/pqqjtt4jI34

ByungChan Park / Assignment 2 / Presenting in English Fri 12

ByungChan Park / Assignment 2 / Presenting in English Fri 12

Seohee Park / Assignment2 / Presenting in English Friday12

Shinhee Kim / Assignment2 / Presenting in English Fri12


https://youtu.be/aHyOutcuz0Y


Survey on College Students' Job Seeking :)

Hyun-jin Cho/Assignment number 2/Friday 1-2

Sohee Lee/Assignment 2/ Presenting in English Friday 1,2

https://youtu.be/qjaYgW2eZOQ



네이버 메일 앱에서 보냈습니다.

Friday, June 3, 2016

Wonjae LEE/Fri.12/Assignment2

https://youtu.be/Ep327rt_Mn8

Matthew Sung / Assignment2 / Present in English Fri 12

https://youtu.be/rJ3HeEU2f2g

 

Young People Today

Survey on university policy for retaking courses 

Dong Gun Lee / Assignment 2 / Friday 1-2 Class

https://youtu.be/s1noMEVtVgQ 

 

Speaking Feedback
Date : 2016/06/03 (YY/MM/DD)
Speaker: Dong Gun Lee
Evaluator: Dong Gun Lee
Title : Run for your life


1. What strong points does the speaker have? 


I believe that my strong points were eye-contacts, gestures, voice, and pronunciation. I tried to make every eye-contact with the audiences, including the audience who took the video. I didn't bring my speech to the podium so that I could make eye-contacts throughout my whole speech. The gestures I have made during my speech were adequate enough. I tried to make big and powerful gestures so that I could catch the audiences' attention. Although some gestures seemed inappropriate, the overall gestures were appropriate. In addition, my voice was loud and clear enough for all the audiences to listen. I had a creaking sound at the end of my speech where I said, "~ carried out for so long", which kind of made my intonation awkward. Besides the last part, my voice and pronunciation was clear to deliver my speech effectively.


2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? 

 

Many would have heard about the festival 'running of the bulls.' However, I certainly believe that the details I presented were quite new and unique, starting from which festival running of the bulls takes place as a daily event to the history and process of the running of the bulls. The information was detailed and specific and it allowed the audiences to have an opportunity to know more about the festival event.


3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? 

 

Yes. I can assent with confidence that I did my best to deliver an impressive speech. At first, I wrote a speech regarding 'Internship', through adequate preparation of surveying more than sixty HUFS students and making more than twenty pages of PPT slides. However, I thought it would be better to give an informative speech based on Unit 4. Then, I wrote a speech about the hidden facts of South Korea, ordering from A-Z in an alphabetical order. However, at the last moment, I switched my topic from the A-Z speech to the running of the bulls. I thought that running of the bulls would be a topic that could convey more details and information as well as include the process of the event. I worked really hard to make the best out of it. I searched many reliable resources to include, including the official Spanish festival website.



4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
 

As I previously said, I tried to be as clear as possible so that people could hear my speech.

My voice started to soar during my speech, because I delivered a speech in a very big classroom at the social science building 206.


5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? 

I first started my speech with the phrase, "Run for your life." I tried to catch many people's attention through the phrase and I actually succeeded. I saw some people who were smiling or eager to know what is next. I also previewed what I was going to explain during my speech. Then, I had three body paragraphs, the first being the brief explanation of the eight-day festival of San Fermin, the second being the overall information about the running of the bulls, and last the specific process of the running of the bulls. Lastly, I had a conclusion of how some critics are strongly against the event, but is undeniable that the event has a long history and sort of reviewed my speech. I also ended my speech with my first part of my speech, "Run for your life."


6. Please comment on the speaker's use of notes/eye contact. 

 

I didn't use my notes, because I thought if I had notecards, I would continuously be looking at them during my speech. So, I tried to memorize my speech, as well as adding some impromptu sentences to look more natural. And as I've previously mentioned, I made eye-contacts with every person.



7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? 

 

I could have tried to be more relaxed and calm. There were some parts where I accidently made mistakes, such as 'animal rights activists', where I should have said 'animal rights activists' but, first said 'animal activists' though I corrected my mistake right away. Another mistake was 'northeastern', but I was confused with 'southeastern' and made a mistake. However, it was more of a subtle issue. Also, I could have sounded more relaxing if I were to lower down my voice. I was speaking too loud and was too harsh, later leading myself to sound a bit awkward when I said, "carried out for so long~." Lastly, I could have used fewer gestures, as some of my gestures seemed inadequate. It didn't bother the entire speech, but to improve my speech, I could have done better.



8. What did you like about the presentation?
 
    

I think the PPT slides made it easier for the audiences to understand the festival event. The pictures and summarized wordings made the speech easy to follow. I also liked how I looked more confident than my previous speech, though I was nervous, and accomplished my task of faking myself to look confident. It was also a presentation to look back at what I did wrong and what improvements were to be made.