1. What strong points does the speaker have? The speaker finely introduced the topic by showing our general thoughts.Languages used were clear and simple enough for the audience to understand.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? The topic was about love, actually a survey about what 20's people think about love. And as an audience,i could see clearly what the general point is all about, and some results as dating frequencies were surprising as well. 3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes. i could see the survey questions were constructed to point out the general knowledge of 20's perspective. And also,the results were fairly derived. 4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? Yes. it was clear enough to understand the whole context. But it would've been better if the speaker had spoken a bit louder. 5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? Yes. The speech was finely constructed, and the results derived was good, and added comments the presenter added was impressive. 6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. Overall,it was fine. It would've been better if the speaker made more eye contact with the audience. 7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? It would be more eye contacts. And if he added a little bit more about the contents, what each questions meant to point out the big picture would have been perfect. 8. What did you like about the presentation? Although the subject was the survey format, but the speech was fun overall. The topic the speaker chose was interesting, and the part i really liked is how he added is personal opinions based on the results. It somewhat touched me as a listener.
Date : 6. 7. 2016 Speaker: JungMin Lee Evaluator: JungMin Lee Title : What people in their 20s think about love
1. What strong points does the speaker have? The general organization of the speech and the preparation with the powerpoint were the two points that were good for this presentation.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? The audiences should have known well about the speech subject with the help of visual aids. The speech was how people in their 20s think about love, and the graphs shown during the presentation shows what the results for the survey were.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes, it was way better than my first presentation. I was prepared with a powerpoint, and the general speech was a lot better than the first one. However, the problem with eye contact was shown during the presentation. This shows that I did not actually memorize or at least have the general context in my head.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? Voice was clear, but there were some parts where I had problems with fluency.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? Yes, as I have mentioned above, the general organization of the speech was good. However, it could’ve been better if the conclusion was a little bit longer.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. This was the major problem that I had for this presentation. I did not make a lot of eye contacts with the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? More eye contacts, definitely. And if I had summarized the results again in the conclusion, it would’ve been better.
8. What did you like about the presentation? The organization of the speech, well prepared powerpoints were the two major points that I was satisfied for this presentation. I need to work on making more eye contacts and relaxing during the presentation.
Speaking Feedback
ReplyDelete1. What strong points does the speaker have?
The speaker finely introduced the topic by showing our general thoughts.Languages used were clear and simple enough for the audience to understand.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
The topic was about love, actually a survey about what 20's people think about love. And as an audience,i could see clearly what the general point is all about, and some results as dating frequencies were surprising as well.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes. i could see the survey questions were constructed to point out the general knowledge of 20's perspective. And also,the results were fairly derived.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
Yes. it was clear enough to understand the whole context. But it would've been better if the speaker had spoken a bit louder.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
Yes. The speech was finely constructed, and the results derived was good, and added comments the presenter added was impressive.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
Overall,it was fine. It would've been better if the speaker made more eye contact with the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
It would be more eye contacts. And if he added a little bit more about the contents, what each questions meant to point out the big picture would have been perfect.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
Although the subject was the survey format, but the speech was fun overall. The topic the speaker chose was interesting, and the part i really liked is how he added is personal opinions based on the results. It somewhat touched me as a listener.
Date : 6. 7. 2016
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: JungMin Lee
Evaluator: JungMin Lee
Title : What people in their 20s think about love
1. What strong points does the speaker have?
The general organization of the speech and the preparation with the powerpoint were the two points that were good for this presentation.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
The audiences should have known well about the speech subject with the help of visual aids. The speech was how people in their 20s think about love, and the graphs shown during the presentation shows what the results for the survey were.
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes, it was way better than my first presentation. I was prepared with a powerpoint, and the general speech was a lot better than the first one. However, the problem with eye contact was shown during the presentation. This shows that I did not actually memorize or at least have the general context in my head.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
Voice was clear, but there were some parts where I had problems with fluency.
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
Yes, as I have mentioned above, the general organization of the speech was good. However, it could’ve been better if the conclusion was a little bit longer.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
This was the major problem that I had for this presentation. I did not make a lot of eye contacts with the audience.
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
More eye contacts, definitely. And if I had summarized the results again in the conclusion, it would’ve been better.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
The organization of the speech, well prepared powerpoints were the two major points that I was satisfied for this presentation. I need to work on making more eye contacts and relaxing during the presentation.